Control

The first time I learned how to disappear, I was not trying to disappear.

I was trying to be good at something.

I was fifteen, standing in a bathroom stall between rounds of a debate tournament, eating half a granola bar like it was evidence. Not hunger exactly—more like math. Something I could calculate and stay in control of. If I could control this one thing, maybe everything else would stay stable too: my performance, my voice, the version of me that could walk into a room and never hesitate.

I remember thinking, very clearly, that discipline was just another word for security.

At the time, it worked. That is the strange part. The things that become dangerous later often start as things that make you feel unusually capable. I got better at everything that required structure: speaking, writing, competing, explaining. I learned how to take up less space physically while taking up more space intellectually. No one calls that a problem when you are succeeding.

There is a version of the story where everything looks clean. High school leadership roles. Debate captain. Math team. STEM clubs. Teaching younger students. Later, neuroscience at a university that sounds impressive when you say it out loud. A minor in public policy that makes it all feel socially meaningful. Another in mathematics that makes it feel precise.

From the outside, nothing in that trajectory signals fracture.

But fracture does not always announce itself. Sometimes it organizes itself very efficiently.

The first place I noticed the gap was not emotional. It was logistical.

I could no longer tell when I was hungry in a way that felt reliable. The signal became something I had to interpret instead of something I experienced. Even basic internal cues started to feel like data points I had to analyze rather than sensations I could trust.

At the same time, I was learning how the brain constructs behavior, how repetition strengthens pathways, how systems optimize for what they are repeatedly asked to do. Plasticity, my professors called it. Adaptation. Efficiency.

It sounded harmless.

It is hard to explain how something can be both educational and quietly implicated in how you start to erase yourself.

Because what I was good at—what I was rewarded for—was control. And control is a skill that rarely tells you when it has started to take more than it gives.

I did not think of it as an eating disorder at first. That word felt too clinical, too final, too external. What I had felt more like a private logic system. A set of rules that made sense only if I did not question them too closely.

And I did not question them, because questioning them would have required admitting there was something underneath the rules that needed attention.

So I stayed functional.

That word—functional—gets used like a compliment in high-achieving spaces. It means you are not falling apart in a way that disrupts other people. It does not mean you are okay. It means you are compatible with expectations.

There were years where I could not separate discipline from identity. If I followed the rules, I was successful. If I was successful, I was safe. If I was safe, nothing had to change.

It was circular. It was airtight. It was also unsustainable. After I went from 150 to 80 pounds, I was put in an extremely thorough recovery program by my pediatrician.

What eventually broke the system was not a single event. It was an accumulation.

The body does not stay theoretical forever.

There is a moment I remember that I still do not know how to categorize. I was sitting in a library between classes, looking at notes, when I realized I could not feel certain parts of myself clearly anymore. Hunger, fatigue, emotional response—they were still there, but distant, like they belonged to someone I used to be able to access easily.

I remember thinking: I could keep going like this indefinitely.

And then immediately realizing that “indefinitely” was not the same as “without cost.”

Recovery, when it began, did not feel like a turning point. It felt like interference.

It disrupted a system that had been working, even if the system was harming me. That is something people do not say enough: that unhealthy patterns often stabilize into something that feels like reliability. You can build an entire life around something that is quietly extracting from you, as long as it keeps you moving.

What recovery actually required was not motivation. It was reintroducing uncertainty.

Eating without justification. Resting without earning it. Letting bodily signals exist without immediately translating them into a rule or exception.

At first, that felt like failure.

Then it started to feel like something closer to relearning a language I had stopped speaking.

The strange part is that I did not stop being ambitious. I did not stop caring about neuroscience, or policy, or understanding systems. I did not stop being interested in how the brain works or how institutions shape behavior.

What changed was the direction of control.

Before, control moved inward as restriction. Now, I am slowly learning what it means for control to loosen without disappearing entirely. But even now, years later, there are versions of me that still feel like they belong to different operating systems.

There is the version who can walk into a room and speak fluently about brain-behavior relationships, public policy frameworks, mathematical models. That version is coherent. She is effective. She is still the one most people meet first.

And there is another version that is less structured, less optimized, harder to present cleanly in conversation. She does not always translate well into achievement. She does not always know how to justify her own existence in productive terms.

The gap between them is not dramatic anymore. It is subtle. Which is why it matters.

Because the most persistent lies are not the ones you tell loudly. They are the ones that become so integrated into how you function that you stop recognizing them as choices.

I used to think the goal was to close the gap completely.

Now I think that may be the wrong framing.

Maybe the question is not whether the gap exists, but whether it has to be maintained at the expense of noticing it.

Whether it is possible to live inside a life that was built for performance and still occasionally refuse to confuse performance with truth.

I do not have a clean ending for this.

What I have is a body that is no longer something I try to override.

And a mind that is still learning how to tell the difference between discipline that protects me and discipline that erases me.

Those are not the same thing.

I used to act like they were.

***

***

The ManifestStation publishes content on various social media platforms many have sworn off. We do so for one reason: our understanding of the power of words. Our content is about what it means to be human, to be flawed, to be empathetic. In refusing to silence our writers on any platform, we also refuse to give in to those who would create an echo chamber of division, derision, and hate. Continue to follow us where you feel most comfortable, and we will continue to put the writing we believe in into the world. 

***

Our friends at Corporeal Writing are reinventing the writing workshop one body at a time.

Check out their current online labs, and tell them we sent you!

***

Inaction is not an option,
Silence is not a response

See our Resources and Rea

Previous article
RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

- Advertisment -

Most Popular

The Longer Version

Acetaminophen

Paper Oceans

Recent Comments